Review Category : Structural Methods

Two Strength Design Approaches.

The strength design procedure for tall, slender walls is found in Section 9.3.4.4 of TMS 402-22 and in Section 9.3.5.4 of TMS 402-16 and TMS 402-13. This procedure requires that the engineer accounts for P-delta effects. This can be done in one of three ways. The first is a step-function analysis, which is iterative. The second allows the use of a second-order analysis, such as that used in some software. The third is a moment magnifier method that is less cumbersome than the step-function method but can also be more conservative. This article reviews the step-function method and the moment magnification method.

Read More →

It has never been easier

The design and assessment of concrete elements are typically performed at the sectional (1-D element) or point (2-D element) level. This procedure is described in all structural design standards, e.g., the American Concrete Institute’s ACI 318-19, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, EN 1992-1-1, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures, or the International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib) Model Code. All of these standards are used in everyday structural engineering practice. However, it is not always understood that the procedure is only acceptable in areas where the Bernoulli-Navieri hypothesis of plane strain distribution applies (referred to as B-regions). The places where this hypothesis does not apply are called discontinuity or disturbed regions (D-Regions). Examples of B and D regions of 1-D elements are shown in Figure 1.
These include bearing areas, parts where concentrated loads are applied, locations where an abrupt change in the cross-section occurs, openings, etc. In addition, designers meet a lot of other D-Regions, such as walls, bridge diaphragms, corbels, etc., when designing concrete structures.

Read More →
STRUCTURE magazine