Related Articles
View All
Seismic Retrofit Ordinances Part 4
Past earthquakes in California have shown that some concrete buildings, with certain design and detailing characteristics, perform poorly in large earthquakes and have long been known to present threats to life-safety.
April 30, 2025
Seismic Retrofit Ordinances Part 3: Concrete Tilt-up & Wood Soft-Story
Developing code provisions for a class of buildings that are relatively similar is difficult. A better approach is to define the problem, present information on past building performance during earthquakes, and then let the structural engineer decide on the appropriate design.
March 31, 2025
Seismic Retrofit Ordinances Part 2—Understanding Earthquakes
Besides the structural aspects of a building, geologic effects as well as non-structural hazards need to be addressed in any retrofit.
February 28, 2025
Sustainability in Structural Design in High Seismic Regions
Combining viscous dampers with advanced structural design technologies can be effective in identifying optimized retrofit solutions.
February 28, 2025
Improved Economy & Resilience With Mast Frames
An innovative seismic design approach provided an optimal solution for Samuel Merritt University's new steel 10-story, 259,000-square foot research, and academic building.
February 28, 2025
Mandatory Seismic RetrofitOrdinance Review–Part 1
Two summers ago, I had the opportunity and pleasure to present on “Post-Elastic Design” at the 12th Annual Structural Engineers Association of Alabama (SEAoAL) Code Conference & XPO in Homewood, Alabama.
January 30, 2025
Related News
News
ASCE 7-22 Ground Motions – A Rational Approach for Structural Engineers
If you have projects in the Central and Eastern United States (CEUS), you may be in for a surprise when you use the new seismic ground motion values of ASCE 7-22. The purpose of this article is to provide guidance […]
January 2, 2025