Modern Methods of Construction (MMC): A Solution for the Global Housing Crisis

To view the figures and tables associated with this article, please refer to the flipbook above.

The housing crisis is a multifaceted global problem that impacts millions of people. The need for affordable housing has increased dramatically due to rapid urbanization, population expansion, and economic inequities greatly beyond the ability of conventional construction methods to provide suitable and timely solutions. Lower-income and marginalized groups are mostly impacted by this crisis, which is characterized by acute shortages of housing units, rising costs, and low standards of living in many areas of the world.

To overcome these obstacles, Modern Methods of Construction (MMC) have become a viable option. MMC includes a variety of cutting-edge methods, such as prefabrication, modular building systems, and off-site construction, that increase productivity, lower costs, and produce higher-quality structures. MMC potentially provides an efficient way to significantly speed up project delivery and reduce overall costs by moving major elements of the building process from conventional on-site methods to controlled factory settings.

MMC represents a transformative approach to building, shifting many traditional construction activities to a controlled factory environment. This raises building quality and sustainability while increasing efficiency. MMC includes methods like 2D panelized systems, in which substantial wall pieces are prefabricated and sent to the site for assembly, and 3D volumetric modular construction, in which whole rooms or portions of structures are built off-site and then transported for erection on location.

Although the idea of prefabrication dates back to the 19th century, it is currently experiencing a renaissance due to technological advances and the increased need for affordable and environmentally friendly building solutions in response to both population growth and climate change impacts. MMC applications span from large-scale commercial and institutional structures to residential dwellings. For example, due mainly to government initiatives to alleviate housing shortages and promote sustainability, MMC currently makes up a sizable fraction of new building projects in the UK.

Because of its adaptability, MMC may be used in a variety of building sizes and forms. Modular high-rise buildings in China show MMC’s capacity to complete massive, intricate structures in a fraction of the time needed for conventional construction. In a similar vein, other European nations, like Germany and Sweden, have included MMC widely into their building plans, taking use of its advantages to build reasonably priced and energy-efficient houses.

The housing crisis is a global issue that can intensify social inequality and lead to increased pressure on urban infrastructure and resources. About 3 billion people, or 40% of the world’s population, would require access to suitable housing by 2030, according to UN-Habitat. This tremendous demand serves as a stark reminder of the shortcomings of traditional construction techniques, which are sometimes expensive, slow, and unable to keep pace with the rate of urbanization and population growth.

Cities in North America, such as Los Angeles and Vancouver, where homelessness is on an upward trajectory and property values are surging, are severely lacking in affordable housing. The affordability dilemma for middle-class and lower-class families has been made worse by the over 30% increase in the median housing price in Los Angeles alone over the last five years. Comparable problems are being faced by European nations like Germany and the UK.

Conventional construction methods are unable to meet these demands, becoming less and less viable due to dependence on on-site labor, lengthy schedules, and vulnerability to delays and cost overruns. Building a single-family home the traditional way can take six months to a year, and unexpected problems can drive up expenses by 10 to 15%.

Furthermore, traditional building methods frequently fall short of the sustainability standards necessary to tackle climate change. About 39% of the world’s carbon emissions are attributable to the construction industry, mainly because of inefficient building methods and materials. MMC and other creative ideas provide a path ahead. By employing these techniques, the building sector may get past the drawbacks of conventional methods and satisfy the pressing need for reasonably priced, environmentally friendly housing on a worldwide basis.

MMC addresses the worldwide housing issue in several ways:

Cost Efficiency: The saving on building expenses is one of MMC’s most important advantages. Economies of scale are possible with off-site mass production in a factory, which helps reduce labor expenses and material waste. Research from the UK suggests that MMC is a feasible choice for affordable housing projects since it may reduce building costs by up to 20% compared to traditional techniques. Additionally, significant savings can be achieved by adopting optimization techniques for the elements and connections of the modular systems.

Speed and Time Savings: MMC shortens the building schedule considerably. Projects can move on with site preparation concurrently and cut down construction time by half using prefabricating components off-site. Using modular construction techniques, a construction group in China completed the construction of a 57-story skyscraper in just 19 days, demonstrating the possibility for rapid project delivery. This speed is especially important in areas where there is an acute housing scarcity since traditional approaches are unable to quickly fulfill the demand.

Quality and Precision: Building component quality and precision are improved by the factory’s regulated environment. Strict quality control lowers the possibility of flaws and guarantees uniform standards for all building components. Over time, fewer expensive repairs and maintenance will be required due to the increased structural integrity and improved performance of buildings.

Environmental Impact: By consuming less energy and producing less waste material, MMC helps to make buildings more sustainable. Because prefabrication techniques use more precisely cut and assembled components than on-site construction, they produce less waste. Carbon footprints of buildings are further reduced by the adoption of energy-efficient technology and sustainable materials like timber in various MMC systems. According to a Swedish research report, modular buildings have the potential to save up to 30% on operating energy costs when compared to conventional structures.

Global Success: Successful MMC deployments throughout the world have demonstrated its advantages. For example, prefabricated modular housing has drastically cut building timeframes and costs in Hong Kong’s public housing developments while upholding high standards of sustainability and quality. In a similar vein, modular construction is becoming more and more common in U.S. urban redevelopment projects, where addressing the housing scarcity demands speed and efficiency.

MMC does confront a number of obstacles and hurdles. It is crucial to comprehend and tackle these challenges in order to facilitate the broad adoption of MMC technology.

Regulatory Obstacles: The regulatory landscape is a major barrier to the implementation of MMC. Zoning and building rules, which are frequently based on conventional building techniques, might make it more difficult to approve and execute MMC projects. For instance, differences in the U.S. legislative frameworks between states and localities make it challenging to implement standardized MMC procedures. It will take concerted efforts to update building rules and expedite MMC approval procedures to address these regulatory obstacles.

Market Reluctance: Many parties involved in the construction sector, such as customers, contractors, and developers, may be reluctant to embrace new technology since they are used to conventional building techniques. This reluctance frequently stems from worries about the durability and attractiveness of prefabricated structures. These prejudices may be dispelled, and acceptance increased, by informing the market about the demonstrated advantages and achievements of MMC.

Logistical and Technical Problems: The implementation of MMC may also be hampered by logistical problems like the assembly and transportation of large modular components. Transporting prefabricated modules to the building site involves logistics that need to be carefully planned and coordinated, especially in crowded metropolitan locations. Furthermore, it might be difficult and require specialized expertise to integrate MMC with the current infrastructure and ensure compliance with conventional building processes.

Skills and Workforce: Another major obstacle is the requirement for competent personnel to manage and execute MMC technology. Retraining and upskilling the workforce is required to operate with new materials, tools, and procedures in the shift from old to contemporary building methods. To address this, funds for education and training programs must be allocated in order to create a pool of qualified experts who can spearhead the implementation of MMC.

Examples & Case Studies: Certain regions, such as Malaysia and the UK, have faced difficulties in implementing MMC. Due to logistical challenges and legislative obstacles, the incorporation of MMC into public housing developments in Malaysia has been delayed. The market’s sluggish response to MMC in the UK, despite government backing, emphasizes the necessity for continued education and policy support to promote wider adoption.

Through supporting regulations and legislation, governments can play a key role in helping MMC gain traction. Removing obstacles, fostering creativity, and advancing the general use of MMC technologies in resolving the housing problem are all possible with effective legislative changes.

Supportive Policies: Governments may put in place a variety of encouraging measures, including financial incentives, streamlined regulations, and financing for R&D, to encourage the use of MMC.

Global Examples: Policies that support MMC have been effectively adopted in a few countries. A substantial percentage of public housing developments in the UK must be constructed using MMC, in accordance with the government’s “Modern Methods of Construction” requirement, setting an example for other countries to follow. In Singapore, prefabricated building technologies have been widely used in both the public and commercial sectors due to the establishment of explicit norms and incentives by regulatory bodies. The development of legislative frameworks and certification processes is underway in Canada and Australia with the aim of expediting the process of scaling up to address the housing crisis.

Recommendations for Policy Makers: In order to bolster the implementation of MMC, authorities had to concentrate on a few crucial areas:

Governments can handle the housing shortage more successfully and sustainably by putting these ideas into practice and fostering an atmosphere that encourages the adoption of MMC. Enabling MMC via policy is essential to beating current obstacles and realizing the whole possibilities of these modern building practices.

MMC can dramatically raise the quantity and quality of housing available globally by offering more affordable, more rapid and environmentally friendly construction alternatives, resulting in decreased construction costs, expedited project timeframes, improved building quality, and decreased environmental effects.

However, adopting MMC is not without its difficulties. Obstacles such as technical and logistical difficulties, market reluctance, regulatory constraints, and the need for a competent labor force should be addressed. Governments are essential to this process since they create laws that encourage MMC use, update building rules, and fund educational and training initiatives.

Examples of successful integration of MMC into housing designs may be found in North America, Australia, Asia, and Europe. These case studies provide insightful information and crucial lessons that may direct MMC deployments in the future throughout the globe.

About the Authors

Dr. Ehsan Noroozinejad is the founding director of the Resilient Structures Research Group. (ehsan.noroozinejad@westernsydney.edu.au).

Dr Tony Yang is a fellow of the Canadian Academy of Engineering, a professor at The University of British Columbia (UBC), and the founding director of UBC Smart Structures.

Associate Professor Pejman Sharafi is the head of Modular Prefab Design Laboratory (MPD-Lab) and a principal research academic in the Centre for Infrastructure Engineering (CIE) and Urban Transformation Research Centre (UTRC).

Professor Mohammad Noori is an Emeritus Professor at California Polytechnic State University and a Visiting Professor at the University of Leeds.

Professor Iman Hajirasouliha is the leader of the Earthquake Engineering Group (EEG) at the University of Sheffield.